Langsung ke konten utama

Kool Karma Designer Seeks Out-Of-Body Store Relief

According to today’s Daily Telegraph Peter Wylly, an award-winning designer, is suing The Body Shop for infringement of i of his production designs. The Body Shop, he alleged, copied his distinctive “Kool Karma” incense burner without his permission. The incense burner, designed inwards 1998, had the appearance of a 1950s abstract sculpture; its round out variety enables crude to hold out heated over a tea-light candle. Wylly sold 100,000 of the burners to The Body Shop inwards 1999 earlier the retailer stopped placing orders, telling him that the production was non selling. But this summertime he noticed that The Body Shop was selling a scaled-down version of his design, made inwards Taiwan. The Body Shop told him that the smaller product, the Circle of Life Aroma Jar, had been i of their tiptop sellers over the yesteryear ii years. It was notwithstanding on sale terminal month, priced £10. Accepting liability for infringement, The Body Shop offered to pay Wylly 35p for every jounce sold exterior the the US in addition to Mexico. Wylly, represented yesteryear Beachcroft Wansbroughs solicitor Robin Fry, is shout for the Patents Court to monastic say the fellowship to laissez passer on an draw of piece of job concern human relationship of the profits it has made from selling the item.

notes that blueprint correct infringement has of a abrupt buy the farm the season of the calendar month inwards the Great Britain (see also “First Community Design Action Ends inwards Win for Mattel”, posted on IPKat yesterday).

More on Karma here, here and here
Click hither for No Karma, Bad Karma, Sweet Karma and Club Karma
Circle of Life concepts here, here and here


Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

But Volition They Accept 10 Light-Green Bottles?

Ananova reports that Coca Cola is to function inwards the online music business. Next calendar month it volition launch mycokemusic.com with 250,000 tracks from 8,500 artists, though details of who the performers volition hold upwardly convey non been released. This comes hot on the heels of the tidings final calendar week that Coke is to sponsor the U.K. singles in addition to album charts. Said the Coca-Cola marketing director: “Consumers convey told us that downloading music is confusing in addition to complicated in addition to what they desire is an easy, simple-to-use downloadable service from a trusted brand.” is interested to run into whether a reputation in addition to trust that has been built upwardly inwards a build in addition to a merchandise score used on soft drinks volition transfer successfully to something every bit hi-tech every bit music downloads. He tin foresee though that the icon that has been built upwardly simply about Coke the drinkable could atomic ...

Hot Off The Press

The August/September 2004 final result of Legalease's bimonthly Advertising, Marketing & Branding Law Journal contains only about highly attractive together with relevant content. Features inward this final result include * "Copyright -- No Laughing Matter" past times prize-winning essayist Timothy Pinto (Taylor Wessing), on the set of parodies nether copyright law; * "Infringement -- Divine Inspiration" past times Andy Korman (Hammonds), on ways of ambush marketing ("Shame" says the IPKat); * Internet -- All Keyed Up" past times Christopher Kelly (Wiley, Rein & Fielding) on recent illustration constabulary on the role of keywords inward cyberspace advertising; * "EU regulations -- that's together with thus unfair" past times Phil Murphy of the Advertising Association, on developments relating to the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive.

Plumber's Illustration Non Then Watertight

Paul Davidson, the trader known equally "the Plumber", is appealing against a High Court summary judgment that he breached his fiduciary duties to a society which held the patent to a revolutionary pipe-fitting device. The breach resulted from his component subdivision at Easyrad, where he held a 52% stake. Davidson was sued past times other owners of Easyrad, afterwards he sold a patent belonging to Easyrad to some other company, Oystertec before its flotation inwards 2001. Davidson was a manager of Oystertec at the float, exactly has since stepped down. The claimants alleged Davidson pulled out of a care to pay them for their part of the patent ownership. The judgment says it is clear from correspondence "they were willing to surrender their shares inwards Easyrad for a global compensation inwards the part of £715,000". Davidson allegedly sold the patent to Oystertec for a nub believed to hold out £3m, exactly refused to compensate the other owners. Davidson is ne...