Langsung ke konten utama

Fake Information Protection Way Injuncted: About Other Representative For No-Marks?

Following activity yesteryear the UK’s Office of Fair Trading (OFT), the High Court has granted an interim injunction against Christopher Yewdall to halt his interest inward misleading advertising for information protection notification services. The OFT claimed Yewdall was involved amongst misleading advertisements relating to notification amongst the Information Commissioner under the Data Protection Act 1998. Yewdall’s ads used phoney damage such every mo Data Protection Agency, Data Protection Agency Registrations, Data Protection Agency Services, National Registrations, Data Protection Registration together with Data Protection Registration Services. The OFT received thousands of complaints from businesses regarding these adverts, which used supply addresses all over the country. Yewdall had previously given written assurances to the OFT that he would non move involved amongst such advertising. The OFT considers that such adverts are misleading because they laissez passer the impression they are from an official body, that the businesses receiving them are nether a legal obligation to register amongst the sender together with that notification costs £95. They too neglect to properly explicate which persons are exempt from notification nether the Data Protection Act 1998. Most businesses processing personal information are required yesteryear police describe to notify the Information Commissioner, exactly many pocket-size businesses that procedure information for express purposes are exempt from notification. Businesses that create necessitate to create then tin notify the Information Commissioner directly, for a fee of alone £35.

reminds readers of his “no-mark” proposal (see today's before “Win Kampf” blog). This is even then unopen to other event of a province of affairs inward which a world agency, every mo the proud possessor of the DATA PROTECTION no-mark, could halt whatsoever merchandise usage of damage identical or like to it.

British information protection cons here and here
More misleading ads here, here and here

Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

But Volition They Accept 10 Light-Green Bottles?

Ananova reports that Coca Cola is to function inwards the online music business. Next calendar month it volition launch mycokemusic.com with 250,000 tracks from 8,500 artists, though details of who the performers volition hold upwardly convey non been released. This comes hot on the heels of the tidings final calendar week that Coke is to sponsor the U.K. singles in addition to album charts. Said the Coca-Cola marketing director: “Consumers convey told us that downloading music is confusing in addition to complicated in addition to what they desire is an easy, simple-to-use downloadable service from a trusted brand.” is interested to run into whether a reputation in addition to trust that has been built upwardly inwards a build in addition to a merchandise score used on soft drinks volition transfer successfully to something every bit hi-tech every bit music downloads. He tin foresee though that the icon that has been built upwardly simply about Coke the drinkable could atomic ...

Hot Off The Press

The August/September 2004 final result of Legalease's bimonthly Advertising, Marketing & Branding Law Journal contains only about highly attractive together with relevant content. Features inward this final result include * "Copyright -- No Laughing Matter" past times prize-winning essayist Timothy Pinto (Taylor Wessing), on the set of parodies nether copyright law; * "Infringement -- Divine Inspiration" past times Andy Korman (Hammonds), on ways of ambush marketing ("Shame" says the IPKat); * Internet -- All Keyed Up" past times Christopher Kelly (Wiley, Rein & Fielding) on recent illustration constabulary on the role of keywords inward cyberspace advertising; * "EU regulations -- that's together with thus unfair" past times Phil Murphy of the Advertising Association, on developments relating to the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive.

Plumber's Illustration Non Then Watertight

Paul Davidson, the trader known equally "the Plumber", is appealing against a High Court summary judgment that he breached his fiduciary duties to a society which held the patent to a revolutionary pipe-fitting device. The breach resulted from his component subdivision at Easyrad, where he held a 52% stake. Davidson was sued past times other owners of Easyrad, afterwards he sold a patent belonging to Easyrad to some other company, Oystertec before its flotation inwards 2001. Davidson was a manager of Oystertec at the float, exactly has since stepped down. The claimants alleged Davidson pulled out of a care to pay them for their part of the patent ownership. The judgment says it is clear from correspondence "they were willing to surrender their shares inwards Easyrad for a global compensation inwards the part of £715,000". Davidson allegedly sold the patent to Oystertec for a nub believed to hold out £3m, exactly refused to compensate the other owners. Davidson is ne...