Langsung ke konten utama

Fake Information Protection Way Injuncted: About Other Representative For No-Marks?

Following activity yesteryear the UK’s Office of Fair Trading (OFT), the High Court has granted an interim injunction against Christopher Yewdall to halt his interest inward misleading advertising for information protection notification services. The OFT claimed Yewdall was involved amongst misleading advertisements relating to notification amongst the Information Commissioner under the Data Protection Act 1998. Yewdall’s ads used phoney damage such every mo Data Protection Agency, Data Protection Agency Registrations, Data Protection Agency Services, National Registrations, Data Protection Registration together with Data Protection Registration Services. The OFT received thousands of complaints from businesses regarding these adverts, which used supply addresses all over the country. Yewdall had previously given written assurances to the OFT that he would non move involved amongst such advertising. The OFT considers that such adverts are misleading because they laissez passer the impression they are from an official body, that the businesses receiving them are nether a legal obligation to register amongst the sender together with that notification costs £95. They too neglect to properly explicate which persons are exempt from notification nether the Data Protection Act 1998. Most businesses processing personal information are required yesteryear police describe to notify the Information Commissioner, exactly many pocket-size businesses that procedure information for express purposes are exempt from notification. Businesses that create necessitate to create then tin notify the Information Commissioner directly, for a fee of alone £35.

reminds readers of his “no-mark” proposal (see today's before “Win Kampf” blog). This is even then unopen to other event of a province of affairs inward which a world agency, every mo the proud possessor of the DATA PROTECTION no-mark, could halt whatsoever merchandise usage of damage identical or like to it.

British information protection cons here and here
More misleading ads here, here and here

Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Australian Kazaa Case

Here’s i to sentinel out for. The Register reports on the latest phase of the Australian representative brought yesteryear Music Industry Piracy Investigations (MIPI) against Sharman Industries, the rear companionship of Kazaa. Sharman is claiming that for sure testify obtained yesteryear the MIPI from Sharman’s premises yesteryear agency of an Anton Piller order should travel declared inadmissible. It’s contention that the raids breached the Australian Telecommunications Act. It claims that MIPI took "communications" from Sharman's routers earlier they were relayed to the company's computers, reverse to the Act’s prohibition on the interception of a "communication" passing through a telecoms system. However, Judge Wilcox wasn’t impressed yesteryear this declaration in addition to fixed 29 Nov 2004 equally the trial date, though the parties volition travel going dorsum to courtroom on xvi July to written report on whether they accept sorted out their disagre

Where Is Canada, Anyway?

Where is Canada, anyway? Yesterday the IPKat posted an exceptional almost the Canadian Mounties' pursuit of infringers of copyright inwards karaoke inwards Canada, together amongst photograph bearing the caption "The Mounties enforcing copyright inwards Canada". He - as well as other recipients of his electronic mail circulars - thence received the next complaint from a reader, Paul Jones (Jones & Co, Bay Street, Toronto): " should reckon a refresher course of teaching inwards jurisdiction as well as geography. The Mounties bring never had whatever jurisdiction inwards Alaska, which was kickoff a Russian as well as is forthwith an American territory. Perhaps it meant to write the Yukon or the Rockies?". Resisting the temptation to audio triumphalist, the IPKat is pleased to inform his readers that Alaska is indeed inwards Canada: it is a house inwards Prince Edward Island. You tin honour it past times visiting the Natural Resources of Canada Atlas site here

It's The Wtmr Again

It's the WTMR again The mo number of Globe Business Publishing's bimonthly World Trademark Review has directly arrived through the IPKat-flap, amongst a giant pixellated apple tree on the front end cover. Sorry, the Kat couldn't honour a spider web page for the novel issue, or a film of the embrace to post service on this blog, together with then you'll accept to brand create amongst a dissimilar apple tree for the fourth dimension being. It's a skilful issue, though. 68 pages of seriously small-print features on topics equally varied equally * the Apple Corps/Apple Computer (non)-coexistence agreement, depending on which means you lot stance it, analysed yesteryear Herbert Smith's Joel Smith (any relation, Joel?) together with Laura Deacon; * the continuing obsession inwards the the United States amongst merchandise score dilution, yesteryear Jeffrey K. Riffer together with Brian M. Yates ( Jeffer Mangels Butler & Marmaro , Los Angeles); Left: Globe Publish