Langsung ke konten utama

Kazaa Non Liable For Copyright Infringement Says Dutch Supreme Court

Findlaw reports that the Dutch Supreme Court has ruled that the makers of Kazaa, the file-sharing program, cannot move held liable for copyright infringement regarding music, films in addition to other files that are swapped on its network. The activity was brought past times Buma/Stemra, which protects the interests of the Dutch music manufacture in addition to had demanded that Kazaa either unopen downwardly or move forced to pay $124,000 for every solar daytime that it operated. According to Australian IT, Buma Sterma has right away intimated that it may right away become later consumers instead, equally business office of its attempts to scissure downwardly of file-sharing.

would move upset if, next this decision, the Dutch music manufacture chose to target private file sharers. So far activity against individuals has been express to the US. While file sharing is clearly copyright infringement, in that place was a fourth dimension when the full general belief was that that copyright would never move enforced. However, this is non the representative anymore in addition to few people tin move ignorant of the music industry’s intention to enforce its rights. Present-day file sharers are maybe somewhat less deserving of the our sympathy. Nonetheless, if the Dutch music manufacture does create got activity against private file sharers, it tin expression a bully bargain of negative publicity.

Learn to portion here, here and here



Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Australian Kazaa Case

Here’s i to sentinel out for. The Register reports on the latest phase of the Australian representative brought yesteryear Music Industry Piracy Investigations (MIPI) against Sharman Industries, the rear companionship of Kazaa. Sharman is claiming that for sure testify obtained yesteryear the MIPI from Sharman’s premises yesteryear agency of an Anton Piller order should travel declared inadmissible. It’s contention that the raids breached the Australian Telecommunications Act. It claims that MIPI took "communications" from Sharman's routers earlier they were relayed to the company's computers, reverse to the Act’s prohibition on the interception of a "communication" passing through a telecoms system. However, Judge Wilcox wasn’t impressed yesteryear this declaration in addition to fixed 29 Nov 2004 equally the trial date, though the parties volition travel going dorsum to courtroom on xvi July to written report on whether they accept sorted out their disagre

Where Is Canada, Anyway?

Where is Canada, anyway? Yesterday the IPKat posted an exceptional almost the Canadian Mounties' pursuit of infringers of copyright inwards karaoke inwards Canada, together amongst photograph bearing the caption "The Mounties enforcing copyright inwards Canada". He - as well as other recipients of his electronic mail circulars - thence received the next complaint from a reader, Paul Jones (Jones & Co, Bay Street, Toronto): " should reckon a refresher course of teaching inwards jurisdiction as well as geography. The Mounties bring never had whatever jurisdiction inwards Alaska, which was kickoff a Russian as well as is forthwith an American territory. Perhaps it meant to write the Yukon or the Rockies?". Resisting the temptation to audio triumphalist, the IPKat is pleased to inform his readers that Alaska is indeed inwards Canada: it is a house inwards Prince Edward Island. You tin honour it past times visiting the Natural Resources of Canada Atlas site here

It's The Wtmr Again

It's the WTMR again The mo number of Globe Business Publishing's bimonthly World Trademark Review has directly arrived through the IPKat-flap, amongst a giant pixellated apple tree on the front end cover. Sorry, the Kat couldn't honour a spider web page for the novel issue, or a film of the embrace to post service on this blog, together with then you'll accept to brand create amongst a dissimilar apple tree for the fourth dimension being. It's a skilful issue, though. 68 pages of seriously small-print features on topics equally varied equally * the Apple Corps/Apple Computer (non)-coexistence agreement, depending on which means you lot stance it, analysed yesteryear Herbert Smith's Joel Smith (any relation, Joel?) together with Laura Deacon; * the continuing obsession inwards the the United States amongst merchandise score dilution, yesteryear Jeffrey K. Riffer together with Brian M. Yates ( Jeffer Mangels Butler & Marmaro , Los Angeles); Left: Globe Publish