Is Ohim Deliberately Suppressing English Translations Of Board Of Appeal Decisions?

's blogs attract real few posted comments, exactly he receives a lot of emails from people who don't desire their comments to hold upward attributed to them. One such interesting e-mail (which has been anonymised for obvious reasons) is reproduced below. The writer industrial plant for OHIM, the Community Trade Mark Office as well as Design Registry. His missive of the alphabet reads:

"Hi,

Since I discovered IPkat I real much bask reading it.

[...] One of your favorite issues is the work of languages of CFI/ECJ cases. But y'all never cite BoA linguistic communication problems. Did y'all know that all non-English linguistic communication decisions of the Boards are internally translated into English? However, they are non published on OHIM's website. I suppose they are non published for political reasons (discrimination of other languages), which is notwithstanding a pity. Maybe users should complain from fourth dimension to time? [...]".

has long been annoyed at the fact that many OHIM Board of Appeal as well as Opposition decisions are non posted on the OHIM website inwards English. Indeed, he has pose his mitt into his suitcase as well as paid a few deserving postgraduate students to interpret them for him. Now he knows that Board of Appeal decisions are routinely translated exactly suppressed, he volition hold upward real much on his guard inwards future.

Can whatsoever IPKat reader who feels an OHIM Board of Appeal determination has been wrongly suppressed delight allow him know past times email?

Search for OHIM Board of Appeal decisions here; Opposition Division decisions here; Cancellation Division decisions here; Community Design decisions here (note that exclusively 3 of the ten decisions listed hither on 29 September were available inwards English).

Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Australian Kazaa Case

Here’s i to sentinel out for. The Register reports on the latest phase of the Australian representative brought yesteryear Music Industry Piracy Investigations (MIPI) against Sharman Industries, the rear companionship of Kazaa. Sharman is claiming that for sure testify obtained yesteryear the MIPI from Sharman’s premises yesteryear agency of an Anton Piller order should travel declared inadmissible. It’s contention that the raids breached the Australian Telecommunications Act. It claims that MIPI took "communications" from Sharman's routers earlier they were relayed to the company's computers, reverse to the Act’s prohibition on the interception of a "communication" passing through a telecoms system. However, Judge Wilcox wasn’t impressed yesteryear this declaration in addition to fixed 29 Nov 2004 equally the trial date, though the parties volition travel going dorsum to courtroom on xvi July to written report on whether they accept sorted out their disagre

Baca selengkapnya

Where Is Canada, Anyway?

Where is Canada, anyway? Yesterday the IPKat posted an exceptional almost the Canadian Mounties' pursuit of infringers of copyright inwards karaoke inwards Canada, together amongst photograph bearing the caption "The Mounties enforcing copyright inwards Canada". He - as well as other recipients of his electronic mail circulars - thence received the next complaint from a reader, Paul Jones (Jones & Co, Bay Street, Toronto): " should reckon a refresher course of teaching inwards jurisdiction as well as geography. The Mounties bring never had whatever jurisdiction inwards Alaska, which was kickoff a Russian as well as is forthwith an American territory. Perhaps it meant to write the Yukon or the Rockies?". Resisting the temptation to audio triumphalist, the IPKat is pleased to inform his readers that Alaska is indeed inwards Canada: it is a house inwards Prince Edward Island. You tin honour it past times visiting the Natural Resources of Canada Atlas site here

Baca selengkapnya

It's The Wtmr Again

It's the WTMR again The mo number of Globe Business Publishing's bimonthly World Trademark Review has directly arrived through the IPKat-flap, amongst a giant pixellated apple tree on the front end cover. Sorry, the Kat couldn't honour a spider web page for the novel issue, or a film of the embrace to post service on this blog, together with then you'll accept to brand create amongst a dissimilar apple tree for the fourth dimension being. It's a skilful issue, though. 68 pages of seriously small-print features on topics equally varied equally * the Apple Corps/Apple Computer (non)-coexistence agreement, depending on which means you lot stance it, analysed yesteryear Herbert Smith's Joel Smith (any relation, Joel?) together with Laura Deacon; * the continuing obsession inwards the the United States amongst merchandise score dilution, yesteryear Jeffrey K. Riffer together with Brian M. Yates ( Jeffer Mangels Butler & Marmaro , Los Angeles); Left: Globe Publish

Baca selengkapnya

mix 4

Cari Blog Ini