Langsung ke konten utama

Is Ohim Deliberately Suppressing English Translations Of Board Of Appeal Decisions?

's blogs attract real few posted comments, exactly he receives a lot of emails from people who don't desire their comments to hold upward attributed to them. One such interesting e-mail (which has been anonymised for obvious reasons) is reproduced below. The writer industrial plant for OHIM, the Community Trade Mark Office as well as Design Registry. His missive of the alphabet reads:
"Hi,

Since I discovered IPkat I real much bask reading it.

[...] One of your favorite issues is the work of languages of CFI/ECJ cases. But y'all never cite BoA linguistic communication problems. Did y'all know that all non-English linguistic communication decisions of the Boards are internally translated into English? However, they are non published on OHIM's website. I suppose they are non published for political reasons (discrimination of other languages), which is notwithstanding a pity. Maybe users should complain from fourth dimension to time? [...]".
has long been annoyed at the fact that many OHIM Board of Appeal as well as Opposition decisions are non posted on the OHIM website inwards English. Indeed, he has pose his mitt into his suitcase as well as paid a few deserving postgraduate students to interpret them for him. Now he knows that Board of Appeal decisions are routinely translated exactly suppressed, he volition hold upward real much on his guard inwards future.

Can whatsoever IPKat reader who feels an OHIM Board of Appeal determination has been wrongly suppressed delight allow him know past times email?

Search for OHIM Board of Appeal decisions here; Opposition Division decisions here; Cancellation Division decisions here; Community Design decisions here (note that exclusively 3 of the ten decisions listed hither on 29 September were available inwards English).

Label

Label:

Komentar

Posting Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Neither Snot Nor Spinach

raised a furore terminal calendar week when he told Ilanah’s favourite joke (“Do Trade Marks Get Up Your Nose?”, viii December). In an urgent endeavour to construct amends past times telling a joke inwards somewhat ameliorate taste, he is pleased to convey you lot a tale which masquerades equally a truthful even out (sub nom. “Actual Australian Court Docket 12659: the Case of the Pregnant Lady”). The story, which has genuinely been doing the rounds on the meshing for some time, goes equally follows: A lady most viii months important got on a bus. She noticed the homo reverse her was smiling at her. She straight off moved to some other seat. This fourth dimension the grin turned into a grin, as well as so she moved again. The homo seemed to a greater extent than amused. When, on the 4th move, the homo outburst out laughing, she complained to the driver as well as he had the homo arrested. The representative came upwards inwards court. The gauge asked the homo (about twenty years o...
Posting Komentar
Baca selengkapnya

Latest Mip

The June 2005 effect of Euromoney's monthly Managing Intellectual Property magazine has a particular focus on Mexico. is pleased to come across United Mexican U.S. of A. inward the spotlight, non because he likes buying counterfeit handbags inward Tijuana simply because that province has grown upwards tremendously inward the yesteryear decade in addition to has buy the farm strategically pregnant jurisdiction amongst growing consumer in addition to manufacturing bases. Also inward this effect are * "Japanese Companies Fight for their IP Rights", on the tendency for Japanese businesses to essay relief through the litigation than through to a greater extent than discreet, traditional means, yesteryear Lloyd Parker, Andrew Cobden in addition to Yukihiro Otani of Lovells' Tokyo office; * Paul M. Booth in addition to Leslie Mooi ( Heller Ehrman ) await at due diligence points that should last borne inward heed earlier investing inward a life scientific discipline company;...
Posting Komentar
Baca selengkapnya

Advice Wanted, Please; Novel Semiconductor Flake Rules

here . New Semiconductor Chip Rules for UK The Design Right (Semiconductor Topographies) (Amendment) Regulations 2006 ( Statutory Instrument 2006 No. 1833 ) bring but been drawn to the IPKat's attention. Made on 10 July in addition to coming into strength on one August 2006, they improve the Design Right (Semiconductor Topographies) Regulations 1989 (SI 1989/1100) to give resultant to the Council Decision of 22 Dec 1994 on the extension of the legal protection of topographies of semiconductor products to persons from a fellow member of the World Trade Organization (94/824/EC). The 1989 Regulations themselves modifyied the application of Part iii of the Copyright, Designs in addition to Patents Act 1989 (that's the fleck that applies to designs) to brand the police clitoris check semi-conductor topographies too. So that's that, then, says the IPKat. Not much to larn excited almost there. Merpel's non thus sure: sure enough semiconductor chip protection is a genuinely exc...
Posting Komentar
Baca selengkapnya