Langsung ke konten utama

Two From The Cfi


The laid about of today's Court of First Instance's (CFI's) appeals from the OHIM Boards of Appeal
is Case T-34/04, Plus Warenhandelsgesellschaft mbH v OHIM, Joachim Bälz as well as Friedmar Hiller.
The applicant sought to register this sugariness picayune figurative sign for diverse goods inward Classes 3, 25, 28, 32, 33 as well as 34. The opponent objected, citing its before High German registration of the discussion score POWER for tobacco as well as smokers' accessories inward Class 34. The Opposition Division as well as the Board of Appeal refused the opposition on the solid set down that in that place was no likelihood of confusion: "the verbal chemical ingredient ‘Turkish’ of the sign sought as well as its figurative element, which consists of a lion’s head, could non move overlooked as well as that, fifty-fifty if the lion’s caput alluded to the persuasion of strength, it was non a straightforward transposition of that idea". The CFI dismissed the appeal.

Metso: inward take of a less descriptive score than PAPERLAB for ‘computer
equipment as well as mensuration installations for surveying as well as testing of paper’


The minute appeal was inward Case T-19/04 Metso Paper Automation Oy v OHIM. Metso applied to register the discussion score PAPERLAB for ‘computer equipment as well as mensuration installations for surveying as well as testing of paper’ inward Class 9. The examiner as well as the Board of Appeal persuasion this to move rather on the descriptive side as well as none also inherently distinctive either (though the application was remitted for consideration of whether PAPERLAB had acquired distinctiveness through use). Metso as well as thence appealed, unsuccessfully, to the CFI. As the courtroom said, at para.33:

"the Board of Appeal was correct inward its finding that the PAPERLAB score described inward English linguistic communication inward a uncomplicated as well as straightforward vogue the intended business office of the goods for which registration of the score was sought. The discussion sign PAPERLAB does non exercise an impression sufficiently removed from that produced yesteryear precisely joining the words ‘paper’ as well as ‘lab’. Moreover, the ‘paperlab’ sign could also move perceived every bit denoting i of the technical characteristics of the goods inward question, since this is a inquiry of reckoner equipment as well as mensuration installations which accept been designed to operate similar a existent mobile laboratory inward guild to obtain, on the spot, services normally performed inward a laboratory".
has no quarrel amongst either of these decisions.

Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Australian Kazaa Case

Here’s i to sentinel out for. The Register reports on the latest phase of the Australian representative brought yesteryear Music Industry Piracy Investigations (MIPI) against Sharman Industries, the rear companionship of Kazaa. Sharman is claiming that for sure testify obtained yesteryear the MIPI from Sharman’s premises yesteryear agency of an Anton Piller order should travel declared inadmissible. It’s contention that the raids breached the Australian Telecommunications Act. It claims that MIPI took "communications" from Sharman's routers earlier they were relayed to the company's computers, reverse to the Act’s prohibition on the interception of a "communication" passing through a telecoms system. However, Judge Wilcox wasn’t impressed yesteryear this declaration in addition to fixed 29 Nov 2004 equally the trial date, though the parties volition travel going dorsum to courtroom on xvi July to written report on whether they accept sorted out their disagre

Where Is Canada, Anyway?

Where is Canada, anyway? Yesterday the IPKat posted an exceptional almost the Canadian Mounties' pursuit of infringers of copyright inwards karaoke inwards Canada, together amongst photograph bearing the caption "The Mounties enforcing copyright inwards Canada". He - as well as other recipients of his electronic mail circulars - thence received the next complaint from a reader, Paul Jones (Jones & Co, Bay Street, Toronto): " should reckon a refresher course of teaching inwards jurisdiction as well as geography. The Mounties bring never had whatever jurisdiction inwards Alaska, which was kickoff a Russian as well as is forthwith an American territory. Perhaps it meant to write the Yukon or the Rockies?". Resisting the temptation to audio triumphalist, the IPKat is pleased to inform his readers that Alaska is indeed inwards Canada: it is a house inwards Prince Edward Island. You tin honour it past times visiting the Natural Resources of Canada Atlas site here

It's The Wtmr Again

It's the WTMR again The mo number of Globe Business Publishing's bimonthly World Trademark Review has directly arrived through the IPKat-flap, amongst a giant pixellated apple tree on the front end cover. Sorry, the Kat couldn't honour a spider web page for the novel issue, or a film of the embrace to post service on this blog, together with then you'll accept to brand create amongst a dissimilar apple tree for the fourth dimension being. It's a skilful issue, though. 68 pages of seriously small-print features on topics equally varied equally * the Apple Corps/Apple Computer (non)-coexistence agreement, depending on which means you lot stance it, analysed yesteryear Herbert Smith's Joel Smith (any relation, Joel?) together with Laura Deacon; * the continuing obsession inwards the the United States amongst merchandise score dilution, yesteryear Jeffrey K. Riffer together with Brian M. Yates ( Jeffer Mangels Butler & Marmaro , Los Angeles); Left: Globe Publish