Langsung ke konten utama

Barbie 5 Barbie

reports that the possessor of Barbies Shop, an outlet specialising inward novelties such every 2nd S&M gear has won a merchandise order representative brought against her past times Mattel. Mattel had demanded a alter of mention for the shop, owned past times Barbie Anderson-Walley only the New York District Court decided that this was non necessary.

Ms Anderston-Walley pointed to the fact that this was her given mention too that her business of goods was non competing amongst the toymaker.

reckons that this sounds similar a prima facie tarnishment case. The link betwixt sadomasochism too doll (at to the lowest degree the assort aimed at children) is non a practiced one. However, it’s ever a fleck uncomfortable to store somebody using his or her ain name.

It’s non clear whether the European Union ain mention defense strength covers outset names only this representative peradventure shows why it should – Anderston-Wally’s Shop would endure a peculiarly catchy name.

Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

Australian Kazaa Case

Here’s i to sentinel out for. The Register reports on the latest phase of the Australian representative brought yesteryear Music Industry Piracy Investigations (MIPI) against Sharman Industries, the rear companionship of Kazaa. Sharman is claiming that for sure testify obtained yesteryear the MIPI from Sharman’s premises yesteryear agency of an Anton Piller order should travel declared inadmissible. It’s contention that the raids breached the Australian Telecommunications Act. It claims that MIPI took "communications" from Sharman's routers earlier they were relayed to the company's computers, reverse to the Act’s prohibition on the interception of a "communication" passing through a telecoms system. However, Judge Wilcox wasn’t impressed yesteryear this declaration in addition to fixed 29 Nov 2004 equally the trial date, though the parties volition travel going dorsum to courtroom on xvi July to written report on whether they accept sorted out their disagre

Where Is Canada, Anyway?

Where is Canada, anyway? Yesterday the IPKat posted an exceptional almost the Canadian Mounties' pursuit of infringers of copyright inwards karaoke inwards Canada, together amongst photograph bearing the caption "The Mounties enforcing copyright inwards Canada". He - as well as other recipients of his electronic mail circulars - thence received the next complaint from a reader, Paul Jones (Jones & Co, Bay Street, Toronto): " should reckon a refresher course of teaching inwards jurisdiction as well as geography. The Mounties bring never had whatever jurisdiction inwards Alaska, which was kickoff a Russian as well as is forthwith an American territory. Perhaps it meant to write the Yukon or the Rockies?". Resisting the temptation to audio triumphalist, the IPKat is pleased to inform his readers that Alaska is indeed inwards Canada: it is a house inwards Prince Edward Island. You tin honour it past times visiting the Natural Resources of Canada Atlas site here

It's The Wtmr Again

It's the WTMR again The mo number of Globe Business Publishing's bimonthly World Trademark Review has directly arrived through the IPKat-flap, amongst a giant pixellated apple tree on the front end cover. Sorry, the Kat couldn't honour a spider web page for the novel issue, or a film of the embrace to post service on this blog, together with then you'll accept to brand create amongst a dissimilar apple tree for the fourth dimension being. It's a skilful issue, though. 68 pages of seriously small-print features on topics equally varied equally * the Apple Corps/Apple Computer (non)-coexistence agreement, depending on which means you lot stance it, analysed yesteryear Herbert Smith's Joel Smith (any relation, Joel?) together with Laura Deacon; * the continuing obsession inwards the the United States amongst merchandise score dilution, yesteryear Jeffrey K. Riffer together with Brian M. Yates ( Jeffer Mangels Butler & Marmaro , Los Angeles); Left: Globe Publish